Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 10:14:41 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: janb@cs.utep.edu Cc: Stefan Molnar <stefan@csudsu.com>, Marek Gorka <marek.gorka@tpi.pl>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.3 and 6G RAM Message-ID: <20010718101440.C941@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.30.0107181043440.25094-100000@gecko>; from janb@cs.utep.edu on Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 10:45:07AM -0600 References: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0107180919230.66935-100000@digital.csudsu.com> <Pine.GSO.4.30.0107181043440.25094-100000@gecko>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 10:45:07AM -0600, janb@cs.utep.edu wrote: > I am interestied as to why this is. Is there a sound technical reason do > not support this, or was it merely the fact that there are not too many > machines that can take advantage of this anyway, and nobody got around to > do this? It requires large changes to the VM system. Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7VcQAWry0BWjoQKURAvPfAJwOrOmznqxzGvpbBbWOJX1QVsPIbACgzoB9 bEvdb3Wg6GHpu3lC1Qw0Ebw= =XOyC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010718101440.C941>