Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 23:13:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net> Cc: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: KSE signals broken by 1:1 commit. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0304062309260.55025-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <20030407010642.E86645-100000@mail.chesapeake.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hey, you're back! I thought you were away for a few more days. On Mon, 7 Apr 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote: > > I suspect that it can wait as well. I had reports from a user that this > didn't break kse but I didn't specifically test it myself. People are > using thr now though so I'd hope we could avoid breaking it. KSE signals > didn't work well enough at the time that I commited thr to be too > concerned. It seemed as if more work was required to get it right anyway. > > Could you please tell me exactly what you want and let me implement it > instead of backing out working code. If you just want a per process or > kseg mask we can do that although I'm not sure if this is correct. > > Really julian, after all your complaints about people asking you to > backout code that broke the build I'd think you'd be a little more > reasonable. I'm not asking for a backout.. I just want to be not nailed to a tree if it turnes out that we cause some side effects in 1:1 when we try fix the broken-ness introduced by it. if you are available, We can pass patches past you so the whole question is moot. I was worried because I thought you were not available. > > Cheers, > Jeff > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0304062309260.55025-100000>