Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 19:22:37 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> To: Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org>, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-user@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r258848 - user/hrs/releng/release Message-ID: <20131202152237.GK48919@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20131202152054.GH1839@glenbarber.us> References: <201312021440.rB2EeQa6012210@svn.freebsd.org> <20131202145103.GG1839@glenbarber.us> <20131203.001628.1233827032249325723.hrs@allbsd.org> <20131202152054.GH1839@glenbarber.us>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 10:20:54AM -0500, Glen Barber wrote: G> > Everything can be overridden by a configuration file regardless of G> > whether envvars are honored even after this change. What is the G> > problem? I do not see negative effect assuming a conf file is used. G> > G> G> This allows the host environment to accidentally pollute the build if G> something is not set in configuration file and unintentionally set in G> the builder's environment. G> G> It was why I specifically did not allow the environment to affect the G> build process. I'd second on this approach. The fact that builds used to depend on environment was very annoying. One couldn't actually reproduce a problem of his colleague. -- Totus tuus, Glebius.help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131202152237.GK48919>