Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:25:07 +0200 From: Matteo Riondato <rionda@gufi.org> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: conf/36392: [feature request] cron starts before vi recover, and vi recover isnt dont securely Message-ID: <20050329202507.GF916@kaiser.sig11.org> In-Reply-To: <45221.1112127225@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <20050329201005.GE916@kaiser.sig11.org> <45221.1112127225@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 10:13:45PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <20050329201005.GE916@kaiser.sig11.org>, Matteo Riondato writes: > >On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 10:03:41PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> In message <200503292000.j2TK0Dl6082442@freefall.freebsd.org>, Matteo Rio= > >ndato=20 > >> writes: > > > >Do you think that we should not even run virecover on such systems or > >that we should not send a mail to the user?=20 > > It's the mail-sending bit which bugs me, in some configurations this > simply hangs boot for how ever long it takes for it to realize that > it can't. Don't know if this matters, but sendmail (or whatever MTA) is started _after_ virecover..Would it be possible/useful to delay mail delivery after sendmail has been started? -- Rionda aka Matteo Riondato Disinformato per default G.U.F.I. Staff Member (http://www.gufi.org) FreeSBIE Developer (http://www.freesbie.org) [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCSbmj2Mp4pR7Fa+wRAtItAJ0dJFqOatOfgMwU3jJzmiYr8CNCzwCfV8SO zg9fc89duFkIyYICp6n+lfQ= =9zMX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050329202507.GF916>