Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 20 Apr 2016 03:57:50 +0000
From:      Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc:        Matthew Grooms <mgrooms@shrew.net>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)
Message-ID:  <20160420035750.GK1554@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <BF66EA01-E073-45F0-8F9E-22D57E8871B0@bsdimp.com>
References:  <E1asbZj-0003Ra-Qs@rmm6prod02.runbox.com> <76093.1461096570@critter.freebsd.dk> <5716AD65.8070007@shrew.net> <BF66EA01-E073-45F0-8F9E-22D57E8871B0@bsdimp.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--NOC/txXbandKISI8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 09:15:47PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
>=20
> > On Apr 19, 2016, at 4:12 PM, Matthew Grooms <mgrooms@shrew.net> wrote:
> >=20
> > On 4/19/2016 3:09 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >> As far as I know, nobody is taking the source code or the Makefiles
> >> away, so if somebody doesn't like the system being distributed with
> >> pkg, they can very well roll their own.
> >>=20
> >> It's nice to see the level of enthusiasm the FreeBSD project can
> >> muster, I just wish it wasn't always enthusiasm for stopping progress.
> >>=20
> >=20
> > Maybe I missed an email in this thread, but I don't recall
> > anyone completely rejecting the idea of packaging the base system.
> > What I see is a discussion related to doing it in the best way
> > possible.
>=20
> Sadly the tenor and tone of the discussion isn=E2=80=99t one where progre=
ss
> is made. The tone has been a bit toxic and demanding, which grinds
> people into dust, rather than motivating them to fix things. You
> might call it a discussion, but it reads to me more as a bunch of
> angry villagers storming the castle. No good can come from that.
> Tone down the outrage by a factor of 100 and try to have the
> conversation again.
>=20

As probably the most demotivated person to read through this onslaught
of nonsense, I cannot agree more.

Glen


--NOC/txXbandKISI8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXFv46AAoJEAMUWKVHj+KT25MP/3GnBZeIVB6Kw+EVzY3MuU+d
fnVfgLHeTU5rZgnttVo3eZ5VTSFiGBoNl/A6prGiuIrwKXIg5UAzdMa+yVIEHE3s
xxi5sl+LsYy1FX8FeJ1UDWGBsg89aUwQUHQt2g11T1DlF2cVnCRqWIbJtRsF+Bto
4HjVM0P6h94kIsxOmILkD3j2Bfc9vV3euwyVVbcZFr2CQcGKfN2wiAPedWeb0mfg
qAOYBC/nvPWbWto3+U+AUpAnEBXOMOjOaMHiwaYd8Ym7afevYtCq5SwC+/dkP+aN
nKnkYyLRO0im6jKxzairc25ZnmdiIZN6x3YtcLTRRqX4E2PYOIh/IXp5mHJ0fH7G
nHrcP9xJPAQPzYwVFfNpPI8Gtkf7yij9ysas73tXn/FgGzN8f7ENyvRwERy9yQsZ
nIkioljIkwrc1tXRAQz7VW79eVpynY7vhsjCgTXsdj8uMV2JTnS6JyeoFQVaqEfh
guKYAkhqfsWEpX81k+c5LDrWKOL31ZAFZ3DXz2neUMvLZo3SKs6WXOSffcFjfHWT
c4wuyBwJ61O/yhlsuegRjpPxRCweX12InlSFGVfV7YkfDXSzVT6xMeqQtbLGT2r9
aV53+jCgXd5HMEcDoP17/dAUKDj03Tjp+rwo+94dynzkPY4xaeH/aQnUQySBv4Pc
P6MxFFwLKfEVEBObYT7C
=ojLo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--NOC/txXbandKISI8--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160420035750.GK1554>