Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 08:53:12 +0400 From: Aleksey Perov <algardo@sura.ru> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: suggested addition to 'date' Message-ID: <20060817085312.797f7b9f.algardo@sura.ru> In-Reply-To: <44E38F2C.8000207@elischer.org> References: <44DD4510.5070002@elischer.org> <20060816131824.67a8053b.algardo@sura.ru> <44E38F2C.8000207@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julian Elischer wrote: > Aleksey Perov wrote: > > >Julian Elischer wrote: > > > > > > > >>At various times I've wanted to add timestamps to logfiles as they are > >>generated.. > >> > >> > > > >This wheel has been invented million years ago. > > > >Install DJB's daemontools from ports, then run > > ..... > > > I can not install ports onto these machines. They are appliances. > > I will simply put the unhancement in out own cvs tree, and the > enhancement will be private. > I'm still comletely amazed that no-one but me thinks this is a good idea > as it seems absolutly > obvious to me and it doesn't affect date's usual behaviour in the > slightest. Actually I don't object but rather agree that adding such an option to date is a good idea, no matter which letter it would be - "s" or "S" or "p" or "@". As for my previous posting, I just suggested one of many possible solutions, like others in this thread did. -- Aleksey Perov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060817085312.797f7b9f.algardo>