Date: 02 Aug 1999 13:05:17 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> To: John-Mark Gurney <gurney_j@resnet.uoregon.edu> Cc: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>, hackers@FreeBSD.org, committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Mentioning RFC numbers in /etc/services Message-ID: <xzpu2qi30k2.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: John-Mark Gurney's message of "Sat, 31 Jul 1999 16:18:54 -0700" References: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9907301505250.7396-100000@dt011n65.san.rr.com> <70382.933458817@axl.noc.iafrica.com> <19990731161854.11826@hydrogen.fircrest.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John-Mark Gurney <gurney_j@efn.org> writes: > Sheldon Hearn scribbled this message on Aug 1: > > Would you need these entries if inetd let you specify port numbers > > instead of service names? > I vote for allowing inetd.conf to specify a port number instead of a > service name... it should be very easy to make the modification, and > I'm willing to do all the work, assuming no one on -committers objects.. The correct way to do this is to fix getservbyname() so it accepts port numbers. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpu2qi30k2.fsf>