Date: Thu, 03 Oct 1996 16:21:27 +0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@spinner.DIALix.COM> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com> Cc: sos@FreeBSD.org, jkh@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-sys@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/isa syscons.c Message-ID: <199610030821.QAA04002@spinner.DIALix.COM> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 03 Oct 1996 10:11:54 %2B0200." <5306.844330314@critter.tfs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> That should be enough to shut up gcc. Althought what to do about the > >> SYSCTL macro for declaring functions where you don't get the chance to > >> do this, I'm not sure about. > > Stick the __unused gunk in the SYSCTL_HANDLER_ARGS macro in /sys/sys/sysctl.h Heh, silly me. I assumed that gcc would bitch if we used a variable that was explicitly declared unused... It seems not... Cheers, -Peter
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199610030821.QAA04002>