Date: Sun, 11 Aug 1996 03:23:01 -0700 From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> To: Christoph Kukulies <kuku@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de> Cc: multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SciText News Message-ID: <199608111023.DAA00548@rah.star-gate.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 11 Aug 1996 12:11:17 %2B0200." <199608111011.MAA27636@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>From The Desk Of "Christoph P. Kukulies" : > > >From The Desk Of "Christoph P. Kukulies" : > > > > > > > > > > > > chuckr@glue.umd.edu said: > > > > > OK, I just committed /usr/ports/editors/scitext. I mailed the > > > ^^^^^^^ > > > IMO wrong place. It's not an editor, it belongs to /usr/ports/print > > > like TeX, only that it's wysiwyg. > > > > Well, it doesn't really belong on print nor in editors however if I had > > to make a choice I would say that the more appropiate category would > > have to be editors --- thats just my opinion 8) > > Well, then let's have an new category, named 'wordpro' :-) > I just thought, since SciTeXt has 'TeX' with a certain intention, it has > a greater affinity to TeX than to an editor. > The "TeX" is probably a misnomer since SciTeXt does not use TeX. We could think about starting a wordpro directory however there are not a lot of people working on good quality word-processors my inclination for now is that editor is a good place and if in the future we get a few more word processors then we can re-visit this issue. Regards, Amancio
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199608111023.DAA00548>