Date: Tue, 26 Dec 1995 20:57:25 +1100 From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: bde@zeta.org.au, phk@critter.tfs.com Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libkern.a going away Message-ID: <199512260957.UAA30149@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> Does anyone want to do this better or differently? >Please go ahead. Long overdue. >Should we add a semi-mandatory kernel option "GCC" which pulls in the >stuff gcc needs ? The reverse is more necessary: an option "NOTGCC" that pulls support out of the Attics for all the functions that depend on gcc features (mostly ones with inline asm). I wouldn't worry about it until we have a non-gcc compiler. Try compiling the kernel with lcc or lint to see how much it depends on gcc. Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199512260957.UAA30149>