Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 15 Jun 2001 19:44:59 -0400
From:      Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@technokratis.com>
To:        Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@flugsvamp.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org, terry@freebsd.org, rwatson@freebsd.org, jlemon@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: New Mbuf Allocator (some graphs)
Message-ID:  <20010615194459.A1549@technokratis.com>
In-Reply-To: <20010615183255.C68883@prism.flugsvamp.com>; from jlemon@flugsvamp.com on Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 06:32:55PM -0500
References:  <20010615185421.A1179@technokratis.com> <20010615183255.C68883@prism.flugsvamp.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 06:32:55PM -0500, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 06:54:21PM -0400, Bosko Milekic wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Folks,
> > 
> >   Here are some performance results. Keep in mind that we're still under
> > Giant.
> > 
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~bmilekic/code/mb_alloc/results.html
> 
> Just for comparision, 6-way results are at:
> 
>     http://www.flugsvamp.com/~jlemon/fbsd/netpipe/

	Are you sure those aren't inverted? (i.e. swap(present, mb_alloc)?)

	In any case, the mb_alloc code you used still has the malloc() and
free() calls during cluster allocation and freeing and still, it looks to
me as very comparable nonetheless. 
 
> -- 
> Jonathan
 

-- 
 Bosko Milekic
 bmilekic@technokratis.com


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010615194459.A1549>