Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 19:26:21 +0200 From: Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.demon.nl> To: Mike Eldridge <diz@cafes.net> Cc: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Alpha 4.x releases (production quality?) Message-ID: <20001018192621.D1832@freebie.demon.nl> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10010180952270.29049-100000@mail.cafes.net>; from diz@cafes.net on Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 09:54:20AM -0500 References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010180235330.20601-100000@spaz.huntsvilleal.com> <Pine.LNX.4.10.10010180952270.29049-100000@mail.cafes.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 09:54:20AM -0500, Mike Eldridge wrote: > On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Kris Kirby wrote: > > Would a general concensus of the folks on -alpha agree that FreeBSD 4.x > > for the Alpha is stable enough for a production server? > > I wouldn't. I can't even get the thing installed. The kernel panics as > it's trying to boot. Linux runs fine on it. I've looked for help, but I On 'it'? Please #define 'it' ? -- Wilko Bulte wilko@freebsd.org Arnhem, the Netherlands To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001018192621.D1832>