Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 15:00:18 -0800 From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk <m.e.sanliturk@gmail.com> To: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> Cc: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>, Zaphod Beeblebrox <zbeeble@gmail.com>, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: iSCSI vs. SMB with ZFS. Message-ID: <CAOgwaMv1J9aifKfU43XyHoBiqXo6GZ02HCmdi%2BiZsqfJZA24zQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1469458445.1458725.1355782970762.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> References: <CACpH0Me7KVFTUGE7S0PjPQ_%2BrpFEOd7t0r74ZyooZ2gVcd4Rsg@mail.gmail.com> <1469458445.1458725.1355782970762.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> wrote: > Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: > > Does windows 7 support nfs v4, then? Is it expected (ie: is it > > worthwhile > > trying) that nfsv4 would perform at a similar speed to iSCSI? It would > > seem that this at least requires active directory (or this user name > > mapping ... which I remember being hard). > > As far as I know, there is no NFSv4 in Windows. I only made the comment > (which I admit was a bit off topic), because the previous post had stated > "SMB or NFS, they're the same" or something like that.) > > There was work on an NFSv4 client for Windows being done by CITI at the > Univ. of Michigan funded by Microsoft research, but I have no idea if it > was ever released. > > rick > > > > > http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/nfsv4/ Projects: NFS Version 4 Open Source Reference Implementation We are developing an implementation of NFSv4 and NFSv4.1 for Linux http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/nfsv4/windows/ http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/nfsv4/windows/readme.html http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/ Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAOgwaMv1J9aifKfU43XyHoBiqXo6GZ02HCmdi%2BiZsqfJZA24zQ>