Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 10:31:40 -0800 (PST) From: Archie Cobbs <archie@dellroad.org> To: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/i386 i386-gdbstub.c Message-ID: <200212171831.gBHIVeD4012682@arch20m.dellroad.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0212162156440.48459-100000@root.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nate Lawson wrote: > > NOOOOOOO!!!!!!! > > previously a 'detach' would drop me back to ddb. > > > > please don't do this! (or provide a way for me to get back to ddb) > > I have backed it out. The original patch I submitted for review had this > behavior covered by an option + sysctl. The only feedback I got was that > the current behavior was considered a bug, hence the commit without any > protection. How would you prefer this work? Hmm, there seems to be some confusion (possibly on my part). What I "reviewed" and approved of was fixing the GDB stub so that when it received the 'detach' command, it would (a) go back to DDB mode instead of staying in GDB mode waiting for another GDB command, *not* (b) continue execution. Nate: did you implement (a) or (b)? I thought it was (a). Julian is objecting to (b) and I agree that would would be clearly wrong. -Archie __________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * Packet Design * http://www.packetdesign.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200212171831.gBHIVeD4012682>