Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 12:35:23 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: scanner@jurai.net Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OSSH and NetBSD's "OSSH" ? Message-ID: <20001004123523.G73561@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010041426100.17392-100000@sasami.jurai.net>; from scanner@jurai.net on Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 02:44:27PM -0400 References: <v0421010ab60116093ecf@[128.113.24.47]> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010041426100.17392-100000@sasami.jurai.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 02:44:27PM -0400, scanner@jurai.net wrote:
>
> Since were trying to keep in sync with OpenSSH as the goal, has anyone
> given thought if we will maintain compatability with NetBSD's
> "OpenSSH" replacement?
>
> I think their decision to do their own implementation is just daft. But I
> am curious as to how this will affect things. I am guessing we will just
> sync with OSSH and if NetBSD's version happens to be compat fine if not
> too bad so sad. This whole thing really annoys me. But I am curious about
> others thoughts.
I didn't know they have decided to fork their own version - all I've
seen in their cvs logs is integration of the openbsd version. At any
rate, I will be continuing to track the openbsd version, and
compatability is something which the open and netbsd guys will have to
work out for themselves.
Kris
--
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
-- Charles Forsythe <forsythe@alum.mit.edu>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001004123523.G73561>