Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 14:27:09 -0700 (MST) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: des@des.no Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 'sysctl dev', round two Message-ID: <20040229.142709.97076438.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <xzp8yiophgn.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <xzp8yiophgn.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <xzp8yiophgn.fsf@dwp.des.no>
des@des.no (Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav) writes:
: - unattached devices still aren't picked up, which they should if
: they have a device_t. For instance, I don't see a sysctl entry fo=
r
: the following:
This is because you are basing things on attach, not a node being
parented to the tree. I have some ideas on how to deal.
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040229.142709.97076438.imp>