Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 18:06:06 +0800 From: leafy <leafy@leafy.idv.tw> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CPUTYPE considered harmful? (was: Lot's of SIGILL, SIGSEGV) Message-ID: <20030819100606.GA22580@chihiro.leafy.idv.tw> In-Reply-To: <844382971.1061287624@[10.0.1.3]> References: <2147483647.1061141322@[172.22.33.128]> <20030817224741.T320@alpha.siliconlandmark.com> <20030818030054.GA58513@dragon.nuxi.com> <20030818211512.GB47959@garage.freebsd.pl> <844382971.1061287624@[10.0.1.3]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 10:07:04AM +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> Removing CPUTYPE eventually gave me back working systems (I did restore
> 5.1-R bits prior to make world). Unfortunatly, I don't have the resources
> to investigate this further, but for the time being, I will not use CPUTYPE
> until others can confirm it's safe :-)
>
>
> Thanks all,
> Stefan
CPUTYPE in gcc32 is like a landmine. But ever since gcc33 import, CPUTYPE=p4
has yet to fail me. I use it for both world and ports.
Regards,
Jiawei Ye
--
"Without the userland, the kernel is useless."
--inspired by The Tao of Programming
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030819100606.GA22580>