Date: Sun, 11 Jun 1995 22:32:53 -0400 From: Charles Henrich <henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu> To: taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: performance... Message-ID: <199506120232.WAA05095@crh.cl.msu.edu> References: <3rg5hv$vc4@msunews.cl.msu.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In lists.freebsd.hackers you write:
>On Sun, 11 Jun 1995, Amancio Hasty wrote:
>>
>> text data bss dec hex
>> 806912 57344 79536 943792 e66b0
>> 510.885u 56.288s 10:23.50 90.9% 1118+1251k 1826+572io 208pf+0w
> The same kernel config that took 23 to 25 minutes in 950412 and an
>AMD 486DX4/100 now only takes 13 minutes with 2.0.5R and an Intel
>486DX4/100. I didn't think there was that much different between the
>April snapshot and 2.0.5, and certainly AMD vs. Intel won't account
>for nearly double the speed. Same disk controller and drive in both
>cases. However, no complaints here. :)
On one of my really horrible systems (486/66 crappy parts) the build time went
from ~35 minutes under 0212 to over an hour an 2.0.5-R :(. Ah well. I should
go and see if the P75 Compaq is still faster than a P90 micron now :)
-Crh
--
Charles Henrich Michigan State University henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu
http://rs560.msu.edu/~henrich/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199506120232.WAA05095>