Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 22:23:28 +0200 From: Matthias Buelow <mkb@incubus.de> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: Max Laier <max@love2party.net>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com> Subject: Re: Performance of 4.x vs 5.x (Re: Lifetime of FreeBSD branches) Message-ID: <42938D40.1050502@incubus.de> In-Reply-To: <20050524201942.GA28257@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <3248.172.16.0.199.1116876092.squirrel@172.16.0.1> <20050523211307.GA36552@xor.obsecurity.org> <42924949.1070902@incubus.de> <200505242141.38289.max@love2party.net> <42938C2E.6020301@incubus.de> <20050524201942.GA28257@xor.obsecurity.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Kris Kennaway wrote: > But are any IRQs shared? Hmm... atapci1 is shared with fxp0 on irq 20.. does fxp0 also require the giant lock? mkb.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42938D40.1050502>