Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 10 May 2021 15:57:33 +0200
From:      Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org>
To:        Chris <bsd-lists@bsdforge.com>, Michael Gmelin <freebsd@grem.de>
Cc:        FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Shawn Webb <shawn.webb@hardenedbsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Patch for patch, but not foreach :-)
Message-ID:  <1cbe6ac6-c48b-a59e-dc3d-18cf59ed16aa@selasky.org>
In-Reply-To: <36f77d67cb2673caf8ce72ec45ce8881@bsdforge.com>
References:  <CAH7qZfumRNfOanUK8Po5bS3Lz5Njndorj-OQxTMWsWJTDymhdg@mail.gmail.com> <12082107-B6CE-4EB3-935A-812FC1966CFA@grem.de> <36f77d67cb2673caf8ce72ec45ce8881@bsdforge.com>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

On 5/7/21 11:58 PM, Chris wrote:
> On 2021-05-07 14:10, Michael Gmelin wrote:
>> What about using "."? Or "/" (which would match the muscle memory of 
>> "search" in
>> less/more/vi/some browsers)?
> +1
> I really like that idea.

Hi,

Thank you for all the good feedback!

Based on the input I've got, the differential revision has now been updated:

https://reviews.freebsd.org/D30160

--HPS


help

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1cbe6ac6-c48b-a59e-dc3d-18cf59ed16aa>