Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 15:57:33 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org> To: Chris <bsd-lists@bsdforge.com>, Michael Gmelin <freebsd@grem.de> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Shawn Webb <shawn.webb@hardenedbsd.org> Subject: Re: Patch for patch, but not foreach :-) Message-ID: <1cbe6ac6-c48b-a59e-dc3d-18cf59ed16aa@selasky.org> In-Reply-To: <36f77d67cb2673caf8ce72ec45ce8881@bsdforge.com> References: <CAH7qZfumRNfOanUK8Po5bS3Lz5Njndorj-OQxTMWsWJTDymhdg@mail.gmail.com> <12082107-B6CE-4EB3-935A-812FC1966CFA@grem.de> <36f77d67cb2673caf8ce72ec45ce8881@bsdforge.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 5/7/21 11:58 PM, Chris wrote: > On 2021-05-07 14:10, Michael Gmelin wrote: >> What about using "."? Or "/" (which would match the muscle memory of >> "search" in >> less/more/vi/some browsers)? > +1 > I really like that idea. Hi, Thank you for all the good feedback! Based on the input I've got, the differential revision has now been updated: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D30160 --HPShelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1cbe6ac6-c48b-a59e-dc3d-18cf59ed16aa>
