Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 12:42:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Timmons <skynyrd@opus.cts.cwu.edu> To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <cschuber@uumail.gov.bc.ca> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: AHC 2940U/UW Not Recognized Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980617123518.29591A-100000@opus.cts.cwu.edu> In-Reply-To: <199806170120.SAA09784@cwsys.cwsent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I can only comment that with aha-3940UW (7880-based) controllers, CAM has been nothing but stable. You'll notice a wee bit of performance increase and faster reboots on typical systems. Of course the latter doesn't really matter much since you probably rarely reboot server machines (they don't crash.) On news servers you'll think that Justin & Ken snuck in overnight, jacked up the radiator cap and replaced your system from the ground up. The performance improvement to our 2.2.6-May201998-STABLE system was _that_ dramatic. I'd really be interested to know if Joe Greco has done any testing in this area which has yielded some statistics to attempt to quantify the improvement. -Chris On Tue, 16 Jun 1998, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote: [snip] > Assuming that the CAM code turns out to be quite stable, when does the > core team think it might be incorporated into the -stable CVS tree? [snipp] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980617123518.29591A-100000>