Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 13:00:05 -0700 From: Maksim Yevmenkin <maksim.yevmenkin@gmail.com> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: [patch]: RFC changing order for khelp modules Message-ID: <CAFPOs6oH8232zZKGWsneD1yNVjBmeSJDfVaPvOHFqHd5Aa0LDQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hello,
would anyone object to the following patch?
==
--- sys/module_khelp.h (revision 582)
+++ sys/module_khelp.h (working copy)
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@
.priv = &kmd_##hname \
}; \
DECLARE_MODULE(hname, h_##hname, SI_SUB_PROTO_IFATTACHDOMAIN, \
- SI_ORDER_ANY); \
+ SI_ORDER_MIDDLE); \
MODULE_VERSION(hname, version)
#define KHELP_DECLARE_MOD_UMA(hname, hdata, hhooks, version,
size, ctor, dtor) \
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@
.priv = &kmd_##hname \
}; \
DECLARE_MODULE(hname, h_##hname, SI_SUB_PROTO_IFATTACHDOMAIN, \
- SI_ORDER_ANY); \
+ SI_ORDER_MIDDLE); \
MODULE_VERSION(hname, version)
==
the issue i stumbled upon is that when i compile in all available tcp
congestion control algorithms into the kernel (instead of using them
as modules) a couple of those fail to initialize and register because
they fail to find h_ertt khelp module (which is also complied in)
thanks,
max
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFPOs6oH8232zZKGWsneD1yNVjBmeSJDfVaPvOHFqHd5Aa0LDQ>