Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 11:42:46 +0400 From: Dennis Yusupoff <dyr@smartspb.net> To: Bill Yuan <bycn82@gmail.com>, FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: propose a new generic purpose rule option for ipfw Message-ID: <5386E4F6.1000001@smartspb.net> In-Reply-To: <CAC%2BJH2x08jGWyaRKoE8PwXcwv555EhDP576-WJd5vZDrF%2Bnsbg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAC%2BJH2x08jGWyaRKoE8PwXcwv555EhDP576-WJd5vZDrF%2Bnsbg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Looks very similar to ng_bpf + ipfw ngtee, isn't it? 29.05.2014 11:25, Bill Yuan пишет: > It is a really powerful thing in my opinion. but it has requirement, > to master it requires the knowledge of the structure of the > packet/frame/whatever. Anyone like this feature? Like it ? please > voice out. -- Best regards, Dennis Yusupoff, network engineer of Smart-Telecom ISP Russia, Saint-Petersburg
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5386E4F6.1000001>