Date: Sat, 1 Mar 1997 13:56:13 +0100 (MET) From: Guido van Rooij <guido@gvr.win.tue.nl> To: burton@bsampley.vip.best.com (Burton Sampley) Cc: chuckr@glue.umd.edu, danny@panda.hilink.com.au, ache@nagual.ru, guido@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-usrbin@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/su su.1 su.c Message-ID: <199703011256.NAA18763@gvr.win.tue.nl> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970225152537.202A-100000@bsampley.vip.best.com> from Burton Sampley at "Feb 25, 97 03:33:33 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Burton Sampley wrote: > > I have to take a minute to through in my 2 cents here. After working in > the EDP Audit Department for a major bank in the US, the thought of a co. > not knowing who has access to root privs is a little frightening. What's > the co.'s reasoning for this kind of setup? I would hope it's *NOT* a > mission critical, production box. > It isn't. Further, you should notice that with the default setup that FreeBSD ships with, only root is allowed to su. So you explicitly have to enable this `feature'. -Guido
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703011256.NAA18763>