Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 16:26:41 +0800 From: leafy <leafy@leafy.idv.tw> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: gcc -kthread Message-ID: <20030120082641.GA31370@leafy.idv.tw> In-Reply-To: <20030120082339.GC92001@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <000b01c2bfc0$8ed86e90$e602a8c0@shara.net> <20030119144233.GA1056@graf.pompo.net> <007901c2bfd0$3ee5de30$e602a8c0@shara.net> <20030119230901.GA89120@rot13.obsecurity.org> <002601c2c029$a0063a30$e602a8c0@shara.net> <20030120082339.GC92001@rot13.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 12:23:39AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > (just curious: has it ever worked, and why was it removed?)
>
> No. An improved (relative to other OSes) kernel threading system is
> being developed in the 5.0 branch ("KSE").
>
> Kris
Since you brought this up(*grin*), how different is KSE to NetBSD's new thread activation scheme? The FreeBSD KSE page does not say much about the implementation details.
Sincerely,
leafy
--
"Without the userland, the kernel is useless."
--inspired by The Tao of Programming
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030120082641.GA31370>