Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 14:21:35 -0500 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: Ceri <setantae@submonkey.net>, "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Heads up, a bit: ephemeral port range changes Message-ID: <p0510150fb8d25727a726@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <20020404095320.GB4598@submonkey.net> References: <p0510150db8d1539dd305@[128.113.24.47]> <20020404005838.P60053-100000@patrocles.silby.com> <20020404011807.GC93977@madman.nectar.cc> <20020404095320.GB4598@submonkey.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 10:53 AM +0100 4/4/02, Ceri wrote: >On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 07:18:07PM -0600, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > > You don't need the old kernel, anyway. You can just use the > > sysctl knobs. > >Any reason why we can't just say that in UPDATING, and then the >few who do have problems (and I think it will be few) have an >instant fix in UPDATING while they get their firewall sorted out ? I think that if the sysctl's are included in UPDATING, then it sounds reasonable to MFC this change into -stable. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@eclipse.acs.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p0510150fb8d25727a726>