Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 21:00:09 -0200 From: JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, spil.oss@gmail.com Cc: Michael <bsdannounce@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Problems with IPv6-less kernel and world Message-ID: <200702102100.11768.joao@matik.com.br> In-Reply-To: <5fbf03c20702101108p686ed116n90fbdf26308f0e55@mail.gmail.com> References: <5fbf03c20702021132y5f931f5esdeab22d0048fa5a6@mail.gmail.com> <45C9A73C.1020409@gmail.com> <5fbf03c20702101108p686ed116n90fbdf26308f0e55@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Saturday 10 February 2007 17:08, Spil Oss wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Well, actually I'm proposing a change to the GENERIC kernel and > make.conf.example to add to the comment that one should add > WITHOUT_IPV6 to the make.conf if you enable NO_INET6. > > That sounds to me like something completely different than contacting > all port-maintainers. > even if ipv6 is a real situation it is not the standard, ipv4 is, then, even if ipv6 is some network's standard it is not a global standard, ipv4 is certainly then, it makes no sense that ipv6 is the default, neither for applications nor for the kernel also certain then is that ipv6 is an ADDITIONAL option and who wants it, needs to enable it, either for applications as for the kernel, not the inverse situation as today but this is not only a FBSD wiredness but a general confusion ... but so far as it matters to FBSD it is funny how many core/OS parts simply ignore NO_INET6 even if set ... -- Joćo A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.brhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200702102100.11768.joao>