Date: 11 Nov 2002 12:16:09 +0300 From: "Vladimir B. " Grebenschikov <vova@sw.ru> To: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com> Cc: imp@bsdimp.com, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NO_WERROR and the kernel Message-ID: <1037006168.686.6.camel@vbook> In-Reply-To: <200210262214.PAA12021@windsor.research.att.com> References: <200210262214.PAA12021@windsor.research.att.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
χ Sun, 27.10.2002, Χ 02:14, Bill Fenner ΞΑΠΙΣΑΜ: > That patch adds pretty much exactly what > > | Revision 1.16 / Mon Jul 22 00:15:01 2002 UTC (3 months ago) by peter > | Changes since 1.15: +0 -5 lines > | > | The transition time for -Werror has been gone for a while. We are now > | sufficiently clean that we can fix any new problems or mark individual > | files as not being ready for -Werror. > > removed. I think that it was to handle the case where people still had > NO_WERROR for userland but the kernel was warning-free and wanted to stay > that way. Is LINT now Werror proof ? I have found that options SC_DFLT_FONT makeoptions SC_DFLT_FONT=cp850 make a lot of warnings, and can't be compiled with -Werror. > Bill -- Vladimir B. Grebenschikov <vova@sw.ru> SWsoft Inc. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the messagehelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1037006168.686.6.camel>