Date: 11 Nov 2002 12:16:09 +0300 From: "Vladimir B. " Grebenschikov <vova@sw.ru> To: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com> Cc: imp@bsdimp.com, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NO_WERROR and the kernel Message-ID: <1037006168.686.6.camel@vbook> In-Reply-To: <200210262214.PAA12021@windsor.research.att.com> References: <200210262214.PAA12021@windsor.research.att.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=F7 Sun, 27.10.2002, =D7 02:14, Bill Fenner =CE=C1=D0=C9=D3=C1=CC: > That patch adds pretty much exactly what >=20 > | Revision 1.16 / Mon Jul 22 00:15:01 2002 UTC (3 months ago) by peter=20 > | Changes since 1.15: +0 -5 lines > |=20 > | The transition time for -Werror has been gone for a while. We are now > | sufficiently clean that we can fix any new problems or mark individual > | files as not being ready for -Werror. >=20 > removed. I think that it was to handle the case where people still had > NO_WERROR for userland but the kernel was warning-free and wanted to stay > that way. Is LINT now Werror proof ? I have found that=20 options SC_DFLT_FONT makeoptions SC_DFLT_FONT=3Dcp850 make a lot of warnings, and can't be compiled with -Werror. > Bill --=20 Vladimir B. Grebenschikov <vova@sw.ru> SWsoft Inc. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1037006168.686.6.camel>