Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 11:40:19 -0700 From: Matthew Hunt <mph@astro.caltech.edu> To: Mike Meyer <mwm@phone.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PPP over OpenSSL Message-ID: <19990816114019.A21905@wopr.caltech.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9908161108010.356-100000@guru.phone.net>; from Mike Meyer on Mon, Aug 16, 1999 at 11:10:06AM -0700 References: <199908161801.CAA03222@netrinsics.com> <Pine.BSF.4.10.9908161108010.356-100000@guru.phone.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Aug 16, 1999 at 11:10:06AM -0700, Mike Meyer wrote: > No, that just means the port is trivial, not unnecessary. Adding it as > a port means that it's got a record in the list of avaiable > applications, and that a package for it should wind up on the CD-ROM > distribution. These are Good Things(TM), and to be encouraged. And also that a list of the installed files is recorded in /var/db/pkg, making it possible to remove the software using pkg_delete, instead of doing it by hand and perhaps forgetting some bits. And also that if the maintainer is conscientious about keeping the port synchronized with the software, users can find out about updates by watching for the "New/Updated Ports" announcement. Matt, who would want true(1) in Ports if it weren't in the base system. -- Matthew Hunt <mph@astro.caltech.edu> * Science rules. http://www.pobox.com/~mph/ * To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990816114019.A21905>