Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:42:30 -0500 From: Vulpes Velox <v.velox@vvelox.net> To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Matthias Buelow <mkb@incubus.de> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.4: Is it generally unstable? Message-ID: <20050608224230.6acbda39@vixen42.local.lan> In-Reply-To: <6.2.1.2.0.20050608134054.06b8ccb0@64.7.153.2> References: <20050608001306.3FB1F43D5C@mx1.FreeBSD.org> <42A6C7CE.9000002@incubus.de> <200506080908.02478.fcash@ocis.net> <42A71AE1.8020300@incubus.de> <6.2.1.2.0.20050608134054.06b8ccb0@64.7.153.2>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 08 Jun 2005 13:42:45 -0400 Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> wrote: > At 12:20 PM 08/06/2005, Matthias Buelow wrote: > > >I remember 5.2.1 panicking left and right, on several machines, it > >was completely unusable. Maybe we just live in different > >universes. > > Me too, but a lot has changed since 5.2.1 which at the time was I > think was called a preview. The topic is 5.4R. What parts of the > OS do you feel are not production ready as compared to 4.X ? It is safe saying a lot has changed since releng_5_3. The most imporant, imo, were those that happened shortly after releng_5_3 was released. Those fixed a few annoying problems I had with it. I feel perfectly safe running 5.4 in a production enviroment. Never had any problems with it.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050608224230.6acbda39>