Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 22:07:10 -0700 From: David Schultz <dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU> To: Garrett Rooney <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> Cc: Morten Rodal <morten@rodal.no>, kpieckiel@smartrafficenter.org, Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@unixdaemons.com>, Mario Pranjic <mario.pranjic@irb.hr>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SMP kernel: FreeBSD vs. Linux 2.4.x Message-ID: <20020812050710.GA1998@HAL9000.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20020811035646.GB589@HAL9000.homeunix.com> References: <Pine.GSO.4.32.0208091409570.6242-100000@nippur.irb.hr> <20020809091008.A87124@unixdaemons.com> <20020809164411.GC78503@pacer.dmz.smartrafficenter.org> <20020809171743.GB290@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20020809203355.GE6050@slurp.rodal.no> <20020809203934.GA94313@electricjellyfish.net> <20020811035646.GB589@HAL9000.homeunix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thus spake David Schultz <dschultz@uclink.Berkeley.EDU>: > That's what I heard, although I still don't know how the > approaches are different. I read the Anderson paper, but I can't > seem to find any documentation about the FreeBSD approach. (Given > the signal delivery problems we're currently having, I'd guess > that Julian et al. are going through the same hell that the > Solaris developers did when implementing threading.) Could you > please ellaborate on the differences in the FreeBSD approach? To answer on my own question based on information Julian posted to -current today: http://people.freebsd.org/~julian/freebsd_kse.tgz To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020812050710.GA1998>