Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 09 Jun 2006 09:26:20 +0200
From:      Massimo Lusetti <massimo@cedoc.mo.it>
To:        freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: 6.1-R ? 6-Stable ? 5.5-R ?
Message-ID:  <1149837981.4303.3.camel@massimo.datacode.it>
In-Reply-To: <200606090709.k5979fQ9020571@lurza.secnetix.de>
References:  <200606090709.k5979fQ9020571@lurza.secnetix.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 09:09 +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:

> No, I meant RELENG_6_1, which is the security fix branch
> for 6.1-Release.  Albert wrote that he would prefer not
> to use RELENG_6 (a.k.a. "6-stable") on a production machine,
> therefore my recommendation is RELENG_6_1.

If read right he is already running a RELENG_6.

> Of course, there might be good reasons to run RELENG_6
> anyway, in case that significant NFS fixes have gone in
> after the release (which I'm not aware of).  But that
> decision is up to Albert himself.

Actually if i remember right the NFS fix are gone in the RELENG_6 and
not in RELENG_6_1

Regards
-- 
Massimo.run();





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1149837981.4303.3.camel>