Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 20:49:10 +0100 From: Armin Pirkovitsch <armin@frozen-zone.org> To: Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 10-CURRENT && ports/security/p11-kit Message-ID: <4EB441B6.9000400@frozen-zone.org> In-Reply-To: <20111104193543.GA1188@tiny> References: <20111104132640.GA1378@tiny> <4EB43AB0.4030107@frozen-zone.org> <20111104193543.GA1188@tiny>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/04/11 20:35, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día Friday, November 04, 2011 a las 08:19:12PM +0100, Armin Pirkovitsch escribió: > >>> ports/security/p11-kit (requested by ports/graphics/evince via gnome) >>> does not build: >>> >> >> Just wondering - have you looked at UPDATING? - especially: >> >> 20110928: >> AFFECTS: users of 10-current >> AUTHOR: eadler@FreeBSD.org >> >> There are known issues installing ports on FreeBSD 10+ due to >> bogus assumptions by various build scripts. This will not be fixed >> until 9-RELEASE is released. >> ... > > I have read this and I have in /etc/make.conf the following lines: > > # From: "b. f."<bf1783@googlemail.com> > # To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org > # Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 13:42:50 -0400 > # > # No, it is not the same. You can either masquerade, by setting UNAME_r > # and OSVERSION, or by editing the headers and scripts that define them; > # or you can use WITH_FBSD10_FIX for ports that define HAS_CONFIGURE > # (which is implied by USE_AUTOTOOLS and GNU_CONFIGURE). Right now the > # masquerading is probably safer, because there are some problems with > # the fix that are still being resolved -- and a few ports that may fail > # despite the fix. But of course if you help to test without > # masquerading, these problems will be resolved sooner. > # > WITH_FBSD10_FIX=1 > > and most of the ports I'm using are compiling now; the port mentioned > here does not (not even with UNAME_r) and I wanted to bring this to the > attention of the maintainer and others; Would have been useful if you had written that in the first place I guess...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EB441B6.9000400>