Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 08:23:09 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@freebsd.org> Cc: "current@freebsd.org" <current@freebsd.org>, julian@elischer.org Subject: Re: libpthread shared library version number Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0611020822190.12236@sea.ntplx.net> In-Reply-To: <4549A9F2.4070000@FreeBSD.org> References: <454936CA.6060308@FreeBSD.org> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0611011935540.9245@sea.ntplx.net> <45494692.5090200@FreeBSD.org> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0611020042290.10499@sea.ntplx.net> <4549A9F2.4070000@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Daniel Eischen wrote: >> On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Maxim Sobolev wrote: >> >>> Daniel Eischen wrote: >>>> On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Maxim Sobolev wrote: >>>> >>>>> Guys, >>>>> >>>>> I have noticed that libpthread shared library version number in 6-STABLE >>>>> and 7-CURRENT is the same (.2), which causes all threaded application >>>>> compiled for 6-STABLE to segfault when executed on 7-CURRENT system, >>>>> unless libpthread.so.2 is replaced with with its 6-STABLE version which >>>>> in turn will create problems with threaded apps compiled for 7-CURRENT. >>>>> IMHO we should increase version number in 7-CURRENT, so that it is in >>>>> the line of what we have for other system libraries. >>>> >>>> It should be done as part of a larger set of library version bumps. >>>> All libraries should be bumped. I believe kan and kensmith were >>>> suppose to be looking at that. We wanted to enable symble versioning >>>> by default, so all libraries would need to be bumped. >>> >>> Well, as I said the rest of the libs have already been bumped between 6.x >>> and 7.x, I don't know if libpthread is exception. Perhaps somebody just >>> missed it out? >> >> When did this happen? Did I miss it? I know we bumped libc. > > OK, you are right, only libc and several others have been bumped so far. But > the point stays - libpthread is not compatible between 7-CURRENT and 6-STABLE > (both forward and backward), so that it should be bumped in -CURRENT ASAP. This isn't a new problem and has existed since libc was bumped. I'd like to see everything bumped at the same time. -- DE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.64.0611020822190.12236>