Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 20:37:49 +0100 From: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> To: Garrett Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com>, Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: What's the official method to test the build now? Message-ID: <12C281DE-55EC-4ECF-95BD-DFA6FCAABA26@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <D52A3077-D504-4315-AEE6-D15A5C799618@gmail.com> References: <CAFMmRNzC5Vz-iZ72LCevw8iVJAKvFtXDC2DSyUZ6EjmpmhHmpg@mail.gmail.com> <1426944905.20654.5.camel@freebsd.org> <D52A3077-D504-4315-AEE6-D15A5C799618@gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On 21 Mar 2015, at 17:25, Garrett Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Mar 21, 2015, at 06:35, Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 19:52 -0400, Ryan Stone wrote: >>> "make tinderbox" has been broken for weeks, so I presume it's not what I'm >>> supposed to be using to test my commits anymore. What's the officially >>> supported make target that I'm supposed to use? >> >> I use "make universe", sometimes with the -DMAKE_JUST_KERNELS option. > > make universe doesn't error out; make tinderbox does however. > >> But the LINT kernels for x86 and sparc have been broken since January. So what's the effective difference between universe and tinderbox then? I've built quite a number of universes recently, and I while I did get a few errors, they were usually fixed quite quickly. Also, universe generates LINT kernel configurations, and builds them. I didn't see errors there either... Does tinderbox generate LINT configs differently, somehow? -Dimitry [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.27 iEYEARECAAYFAlUNyJIACgkQsF6jCi4glqMxvACgzdWOoH62GQY50L+O0Uc+NmK6 bbMAn3mAm9CD+tbveK1nRTf+IzfNkVS6 =SCPM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?12C281DE-55EC-4ECF-95BD-DFA6FCAABA26>