Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 25 Feb 2001 11:16:23 +0100
From:      Andre Oppermann <oppermann@monzoon.net>
To:        Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>
Cc:        Jos Backus <josb@cncdsl.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: DJBDNS vs. BIND
Message-ID:  <3A98DB77.AE110714@monzoon.net>
References:  <200102190547.WAA12829@usr05.primenet.com> <3A90CA94.D7CBCB65@softweyr.com> <20010218233916.J28286@lizzy.bugworks.com> <3A9149CC.7A1FADB8@softweyr.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Wes Peters wrote:
> 
> Jos Backus wrote:
> >
> > [This is rapidly turning into a bikeshed...]
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 12:25:50AM -0700, Wes Peters wrote:
> > > Some of the assumptions behind the operation of djbdns may not hold true
> > > for your installation.
> >
> > Some of those behind BIND's operation may not either.
> >
> > BIND's instability and problems are costing people and companies all over the
> > world real time and money.
> 
> But with BIND, you the user can fix them.  You can do that with DJBDNS, too,
> but you can't share your fixes with anyone else.

You can but you have to distribute them separatly. See qmail-ldap.

-- 
Andre



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3A98DB77.AE110714>