Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 11:16:23 +0100 From: Andre Oppermann <oppermann@monzoon.net> To: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> Cc: Jos Backus <josb@cncdsl.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: DJBDNS vs. BIND Message-ID: <3A98DB77.AE110714@monzoon.net> References: <200102190547.WAA12829@usr05.primenet.com> <3A90CA94.D7CBCB65@softweyr.com> <20010218233916.J28286@lizzy.bugworks.com> <3A9149CC.7A1FADB8@softweyr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Wes Peters wrote: > > Jos Backus wrote: > > > > [This is rapidly turning into a bikeshed...] > > > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 12:25:50AM -0700, Wes Peters wrote: > > > Some of the assumptions behind the operation of djbdns may not hold true > > > for your installation. > > > > Some of those behind BIND's operation may not either. > > > > BIND's instability and problems are costing people and companies all over the > > world real time and money. > > But with BIND, you the user can fix them. You can do that with DJBDNS, too, > but you can't share your fixes with anyone else. You can but you have to distribute them separatly. See qmail-ldap. -- Andre To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3A98DB77.AE110714>