Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:21:23 +0000 From: Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk> To: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status reports - why not regularly? Message-ID: <6.0.1.1.1.20040113141847.042fc870@imap.sfu.ca> In-Reply-To: <xzpeku4t0bt.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <20040113093903.GA84055@mimoza.pantel.net> <1073998390.18384.19.camel@kaiser.sig11.org> <20040114001137.5ce8983b@piglet.goo> <1074000332.18384.43.camel@kaiser.sig11.org> <20040114003443.260c6738@piglet.goo> <4003F684.6090907@centtech.com> <xzpeku4t0bt.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 14:00 13/01/2004, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: >You must have missed the part of this thread where I said "we tried >that before, and it didn't work". I think we're approaching this issue from the wrong angle. In your opinion, what -- if anything -- can be asked of developers which would contribute to the provision of status reports? Colin Percival
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6.0.1.1.1.20040113141847.042fc870>