Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:15:07 +0800 From: Rong-En Fan <rafan@infor.org> To: takawata@jp.freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: acpi extra driver Message-ID: <20061215111507.GA27024@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw> In-Reply-To: <200612151100.kBFB0NAS015046@sana.init-main.com> References: <20061215103747.GA35194@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw> <200612151100.kBFB0NAS015046@sana.init-main.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 08:00:23PM +0900, takawata@jp.freebsd.org wrote: > In message <20061215103747.GA35194@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw>, Rong-En Fan wrote: > >It seems that all acpi_support/acpi_* drivers are listed in > >machine-independent file, i.e. conf/files. But they are only > >appear in i386's NOTES. Well, I know that all these driver=20 > >only appear on i386 before. But now we have some laptop with > >x86-64 cpus, like ThinkPad X60. Shall we list these drivers in > >amd64/NOTES, too? > > I think it's OK. And we may want to hook acpi extras kernel module for > AMD64 or IA64. > How about this patch? Looks good to me. The patch for NOTES is at http://people.freebsd.org/~rafan/acpi_extra_NOTES.diff Regards, Rong-En Fan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061215111507.GA27024>