Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 11:43:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> To: Brad Knowles <blk@skynet.be> Cc: Mathew Kanner <mat@cs.mcgill.ca>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Vinum breakage Message-ID: <200004051843.LAA79634@apollo.backplane.com> References: <200004051344.JAA15337@dean.pc.sas.com> <200004051606.JAA78646@apollo.backplane.com> <20000405123724.A24249@cs.mcgill.ca> <200004051649.JAA78992@apollo.backplane.com> <v0422081db51122bb4520@[195.238.1.121]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:
:> Also, as a general note to everyone, make sure you are building vinum
:> into the kernel directly and not using it as a kld, just to ensure that
:> it stays in sync with the kernel.
:
: Isn't this in direct conflict with the instructions given for
:normally using vinum? Is this a temporary change, until we get over
:some of the current problems, or is this a more permanent change?
:
: Out of curiosity, is this your recommendation, or does Greg agree with it?
This is my personal recommendation - if you are messing around with
something that is under development or test, it is best to build it
into the kernel to avoid getting out of sync without knowing it.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<dillon@backplane.com>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200004051843.LAA79634>