Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 10:16:18 -0500 (EST) From: John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu> To: "Viren R. Shah" <viren@rstcorp.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 2.2.6 for NFS server Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980303101448.27620J-100000@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980225170510.3416E-100000@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 25 Feb 1998, John Fieber wrote: > On Wed, 25 Feb 1998, Viren R. Shah wrote: > > > 1. Is 2.2.6 close enough that we should put off installing 2.2-STABLE > > for a few days? Or in other terms, are there enough stability > > improvements in 2.2.6 that we should definitely wait for it. > > > > 2. I've seen a few mentions of NFS problems on 2.2.5. Are there any > > big gotchas wrt using a 2.2.x box as an NFS server? > > Depends on your clients. For 2.2.5, I can confirm that Solaris > and Digital Unix clients do NOT work using nfs v3. Digital Unix > works fine if you specify v2 when mounting. For the record, the latest nfs fix applied to the RELENG_2_2 branch fixes the problems I was having with Digital Unix and v3 mounts seem to be working fine. Solaris is still a problem. -john To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980303101448.27620J-100000>