Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 01:20:55 +0300 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.ORG>, src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libutil login.conf.5 Message-ID: <20030304222055.GA51866@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <20030304212957.GA40993@HAL9000.homeunix.com> References: <20030303095422.GA20923@nagual.pp.ru> <20030303101518.GA8214@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030303103819.GA22044@nagual.pp.ru> <20030303115011.GA8705@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030303120707.GA24280@nagual.pp.ru> <20030303122609.GA9305@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030303130643.GA25214@nagual.pp.ru> <20030303112151.E49156@espresso.bsdmike.org> <20030303164828.GA28881@nagual.pp.ru> <20030304212957.GA40993@HAL9000.homeunix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 13:29:57 -0800, David Schultz wrote: > I gather from your previous email that you basically want an > authoritative list of yet-to-be-supported capabilities, so that if > third parties implement them, they will make them conform to the > list. While I don't agree that this sort of thing belongs in the > documentation, I don't have a problem with the idea, as long as it > is very clear that they are not supported, and I certainly don't > want to argue about it. What do you think about the following > patch? Looks ok. I think "minpassword*" belongs to this list too, and I think that some clarification needed when PAM mentioned, something like phrase "for base system utilities" to not produce confusion that PAM is required for login.conf. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-src" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030304222055.GA51866>