Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2000 08:34:40 +0400 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@cup.hp.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: mtree again Message-ID: <20000924083440.A49999@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <200009240144.VAA34295@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>; from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu on Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 09:44:21PM -0400 References: <20000915033837.A564@nagual.pp.ru> <200009142341.RAA00700@harmony.village.org> <20000915043925.A83698@nagual.pp.ru> <39CD3698.D2EF0663@cup.hp.com> <200009240144.VAA34295@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 09:44:21PM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote: > <<On Sat, 23 Sep 2000 16:02:48 -0700, Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@cup.hp.com> said: > > > Is their any harm in just keeping the -P flag as a no-op and optionally > > remove it at some later time (for backward compatibility)? > > We should try to be consistent with POSIX.1-200x as much as possible. What POSIX.1-200x says about this thing? I don't have this book in hand. -- Andrey A. Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru> http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000924083440.A49999>