Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 15:32:53 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Petri Helenius <pete@he.iki.fi> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems Message-ID: <20070225203252.GB77932@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <45E1F0EA.2030605@he.iki.fi> References: <20070224215508.GA41968@xor.obsecurity.org> <45E13410.7020505@he.iki.fi> <20070225071946.GA48242@xor.obsecurity.org> <45E14BAD.80909@he.iki.fi> <20070225084737.GA49231@xor.obsecurity.org> <errjlr$a8p$1@sea.gmane.org> <20070225092947.GA49489@xor.obsecurity.org> <ersqpj$9u$1@sea.gmane.org> <20070225202058.GA77835@xor.obsecurity.org> <45E1F0EA.2030605@he.iki.fi>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 10:26:18PM +0200, Petri Helenius wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > >I'm saying that the 7.0-CVS sources, which are graphed, are unlikely > >to differ significantly from 6.2-CVS, i.e. they do not show good > >scaling on this benchmark because of the problems with filedesc > >locking in CVS. > > > > > Could you give a link to the 7.0-CVS graph? http://obsecurity.dyndns.org/holycrap.png Some of the data is old (e.g. the Linux curve is normalized too high because I was trying to compare it from another machine and the baseline comparison was wrong), but all the FreeBSD data is from the same machine. Kris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070225203252.GB77932>