Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 15:32:53 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Petri Helenius <pete@he.iki.fi> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems Message-ID: <20070225203252.GB77932@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <45E1F0EA.2030605@he.iki.fi> References: <20070224215508.GA41968@xor.obsecurity.org> <45E13410.7020505@he.iki.fi> <20070225071946.GA48242@xor.obsecurity.org> <45E14BAD.80909@he.iki.fi> <20070225084737.GA49231@xor.obsecurity.org> <errjlr$a8p$1@sea.gmane.org> <20070225092947.GA49489@xor.obsecurity.org> <ersqpj$9u$1@sea.gmane.org> <20070225202058.GA77835@xor.obsecurity.org> <45E1F0EA.2030605@he.iki.fi>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 10:26:18PM +0200, Petri Helenius wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > >I'm saying that the 7.0-CVS sources, which are graphed, are unlikely > >to differ significantly from 6.2-CVS, i.e. they do not show good > >scaling on this benchmark because of the problems with filedesc > >locking in CVS. > > > > > Could you give a link to the 7.0-CVS graph? http://obsecurity.dyndns.org/holycrap.png Some of the data is old (e.g. the Linux curve is normalized too high because I was trying to compare it from another machine and the baseline comparison was wrong), but all the FreeBSD data is from the same machine. Krishome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070225203252.GB77932>