Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 16:55:24 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> To: Colin Percival <cperciva@tarsnap.com>, freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Cc: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.ORG>, =?UTF-8?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=c3=a9?= <royger@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: number of xen block devices Message-ID: <3132e8d0-68db-940f-5cb1-22fe01b52480@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <010001574a0207f9-d12e326c-e152-49f9-9763-2cf0161f7458-000000@email.amazonses.com> References: <73fad119-03d8-a9ea-c222-f65b22c6feac@freebsd.org> <010001574a0207f9-d12e326c-e152-49f9-9763-2cf0161f7458-000000@email.amazonses.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 20/09/2016 4:50 PM, Colin Percival wrote: > On 09/20/16 16:33, Julian Elischer wrote: >> Is there a maximum number of block devices supported for an AMI type >> installation? > Does "AMI type installation" mean EC2? yes > >> Our tests a while back showed a limit of 14. >> >> Has that changed in 10.3? >> >> If not is it an artificial limit we can get past by simply recompiling something? > There was a bug a while back which resulted in high-numbered xbd > devices not showing up; I fixed that three years ago in r255051, > shortly before stable/10 branched. that may be what we were seeing. I'll know in a few days. >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3132e8d0-68db-940f-5cb1-22fe01b52480>