Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 16:27:06 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org> Cc: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, obrien@freebsd.org, cvs-src@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile README Message-ID: <200606221627.07495.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20060622170955.GY95135@elvis.mu.org> References: <200606070333.k573XmRc067920@repoman.freebsd.org> <200606201516.39121.jhb@freebsd.org> <20060622170955.GY95135@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 22 June 2006 13:09, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> [060620 13:31] wrote: > > On Tuesday 20 June 2006 14:53, David O'Brien wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 07:43:00PM -0400, Tom Rhodes wrote: > > > > Personally, I was debating on just removing most of the > > > > world target with just a message: > > > > > > > > "The world target has been replaced with the buildworld target." > > > > > > No! > > > > > > 'make world' is still my normal building process. Why force > > > "make buildworld && make installworld"?? > > > > > > I don't care how undocumented it is, or obfusacted > > > 'HISTORICAL_MAKE_WORLD' is; but please leave them alone! > > > > > > thanks for your attention. > > > > You can already get that via 'make DESTDIR=/ world' you know. :) And that's > > shorter to type. > > I think I'm missing something. > > Is the only difference between "make world" and: > > "make buildworld buildkernel installkernel installworld" > > That make world has the order of installs flipped? No, make world doesn't include the kernel stuff at all, and the "supported" order (read, if you do it different that's fine, just don't ask for help if you break something :) is to do buildworld, buildkernel, installkernel, reboot into single user mode, installworld. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200606221627.07495.jhb>