Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 03:05:05 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> To: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Dag-Erling =?utf-8?B?U23DuHJncmF2?= <des@des.no>, freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenSSH HPN Message-ID: <20151112000505.GG48728@zxy.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <5643D62B.8040603@FreeBSD.org> References: <86io5a9ome.fsf@desk.des.no> <56428E8A.3090201@FreeBSD.org> <56428F59.5010908@FreeBSD.org> <86y4e47uty.fsf@desk.des.no> <56436F4B.8050002@FreeBSD.org> <86r3jwfpiq.fsf@desk.des.no> <20151111181339.GE48728@zxy.spb.ru> <56438660.5010508@FreeBSD.org> <20151111235606.GF48728@zxy.spb.ru> <5643D62B.8040603@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 03:58:35PM -0800, Bryan Drewery wrote: > > Some for as ports version? > > Or ports version different? > > Or port mantainer have more time (this is not to blame for DES)? > > I am just don't know what is different between port ssh and base ssh. > > We need ssh 6.x in base, not 7.x as in port (why?) and this is need > > independed work on pathes? > > I am missing somehow commonplace for others. > > > > I am the ports maintainer. That was my opinion on why OpenSSH falls > behind. There is no real difference between the base and port version > except that the port version has some more optional patches, and is > easier to push updates for through ports and packages, rather than an > Errata through freebsd-update or a full release to get to the latest > OpenSSH version. This impact only to deploy, not to patch, right? Or bugs found around NPH/NONE patches? > There have been many times where the base version was more up-to-date > than the port as well due to the lack of a maintainer or the previously > mentioned patch blockers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20151112000505.GG48728>