Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:25:19 +0100 From: Matt Dawson <matt@chronos.org.uk> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tmux(1) in base Message-ID: <200909221325.19945.matt@chronos.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <37B47737-E4A4-4CF3-9DAA-B0F0A4CC8901@van-laarhoven.org> References: <20090921112657.GW95398@hoeg.nl> <20090922082344.GA64877@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <37B47737-E4A4-4CF3-9DAA-B0F0A4CC8901@van-laarhoven.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 22 Sep 2009 12:06:42 you wrote: > Our package system is a tremendous asset, and wholeheartedly agree > with Doug on this. So my vote is now a -1. Not that anyone cares. I do. These arguments have changed my mind. Having read most of these replies, and already put my size 10 in with a +1, I've been forced to reconsider due to the overwhelming evidence that most everyone wants a minimal base system and the cogent arguments to keep base clean and free of outdated code. Coupled with the ease of updating ports, can I change my opinion to "keep them all in ports," please? Now I know tmux is there, simply adding it to my local "install this lot first" metaport will work just as well. -- Matt Dawson MTD15-RIPE matt@chronos.org.uk
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200909221325.19945.matt>