Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 06:56:34 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: eth-security : ANNOUNCE : Resources no for ALL Message-ID: <20001005065634.A1270@ophelia.nectar.com> In-Reply-To: <20001004234325.E25121@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com>; from cjclark@reflexnet.net on Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 11:43:25PM -0700 References: <20001004084729.C25121@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com> <20001004114308.B23379@hamlet.nectar.com> <20001004234325.E25121@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 11:43:25PM -0700, Crist J . Clark wrote: > But anyway, jail(8) is a very different beast from the patches. It is > not practical to put each interactive user in a jail for, say, a > several dozen or several hundered user system. And why is that? -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001005065634.A1270>