Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 03:14:07 -0400 (EDT) From: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net> To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/conf GENERIC src/sys/amd64/confGENERIC src/sys/i386/conf GENERIC src/sys/pc98/conf GENERIC src/sys/sparc64/conf GENERIC Message-ID: <20040908031300.T26496@mail.chesapeake.net> In-Reply-To: <413EAC0B.4050906@samsco.org> References: <200409072237.i87MbiL9044294@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040908024335.T26496@mail.chesapeake.net> <413EAC0B.4050906@samsco.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, Scott Long wrote: > Jeff Roberson wrote: > > What's not working well enough with ULE to run with it? > > > > The package build machines were switched over to 4BSD not long ago and > have since been reported to be more stable. I can also lock up or panic > my test machine within seconds with ULE, especially if preemption is > enabled. This was the case both before and after Julian's scheduler > cleanup change went in, also. I wasn't aware there were any more panics after julian's preemption change. Are there any problems without preemption? What causes the panic with preemption? > > Scott >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040908031300.T26496>