Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 16:25:22 +0900 From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> To: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: underexposed snapshots Message-ID: <m2zk4r4ujh.wl%randy@psg.com> In-Reply-To: <CAGH67wSvPYKnq%2BMBukdsYsz46nSya4DX4emKV9B=Pg1g-Wvutg@mail.gmail.com> References: <m24nmz6b2g.wl%randy@psg.com> <CAGH67wSErZ1-96uUJFQ%2BtxXZfzFgPEvFjheHzWWYkXT8Fc6J5Q@mail.gmail.com> <m21ui36ah2.wl%randy@psg.com> <CAGH67wSvPYKnq%2BMBukdsYsz46nSya4DX4emKV9B=Pg1g-Wvutg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> As I said, this is the latest snapshot. Long story short is that the > old process was changed before 9.0 and releng hasn't caught up with > the new process yet in a sustainable manner (at least, not executing > it on a regular basis). If you have interest in making sure regular > (monthly) releases are revived, I'm sure that re@ would be more than > receptive (they're good to have, but I tried to use the new process > and quite frankly don't have the spare cycles to complete the needed > work to make things function post-9.x). if folk such as i hit barriers to testing, this does not bode well for the quality of 10.x in the long run. what is the new process? i could not find in handbook. randy
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m2zk4r4ujh.wl%randy>